A Question of Moral Leadership

May 26 2008  | Views 794 |  Comments  (36)
Some time back I was listening to C K Prahalad on his vision for India. And among the points... Expand

Leave a Comment   Flat Nested


  poetBittersweet posted 3 mnths ago

Check out ixedoc's latest blog, blizzard!



  poetBittersweet posted 3 mnths ago

A lie is still a lie, isn't it? A bribe remains a bribe. Corruption remains. Our approach has become complacent. Everybody's doing it, so shall I.
In the earlier days, there with people with strong principles. Their words and actions matched. I do happen to know some people like that.
Morality hasn't changed. Our approaches have.
There are quite a few young people too who have very standards. Thank goodness for small graces.
Thanks for the nice comment, Rajee



  poetBittersweet posted 3 mnths ago

Me too! Meera!



  blizzard posted 3 mnths ago

Poet,

Good one...where are the role models??

There is no retirement age for bloggers....that's nice and am happy I can blog on and on...:) :)



  rajee kushwaha posted 3 mnths ago

Dear PBS,
    A real dilemma of all conscious human beings. But, are MORALITIES a permanent feature? Don't they change their composition with the changing times? A MORALITY is a sum total of the NORMS for particular behaviour in a given period of time in a social set-up. A ffew decades back--KISSING in public was a TABOO--but it is now a fashion. A quarter century back--a  young girl talking to an unknown  young boy in public was seen as something immoral but  today a girl or a boy without a friend from the opposite sex are treated as GOONKS---earlier it was a part of a good behaviour, today it is the other way round.
    The MORAL VAUUM is in the mind s of old genre---a thought----while the young ones have their own moralities---about which they would resent about some 30-40 years later. This is the way the life moves? isn't it, sir? I know it is hard to agree with me--for I believe moralities are NOT A FINAL WORD on human conduct---definitions change with the changing times and generations---What was DISHONESTY a few years back--has become HONESTY today. Think, sir, think? regards. Rajee. 



  Meera San posted 3 mnths ago

 I wish you are wrong too...



  poetBittersweet posted 3 mnths ago

Thanks, Sceptic(Not so sceptical)



  sceptic posted 3 mnths ago

Hullo Poet ( in a mood more bitter, less sweet)

I am sure you would agree that there were men of high ideals and unfliching adherence to principles in earlier days.

Your above statement is irrefutable.  How would you react to a suggestion that it is not that such people have become scarce but that our social priorities allow them little scope to display their character qualities?  Has not money become the only measure of quality of humans, enterprises, accomplishments and recognition?
Are you familiar with the words  Dharama, Kaama , Artha, and Moksha.?  Intangible forces of social dynamics put these four in an ever changing order of priority.  Ours is an age where Kaam is topmost and is followed by Artha.  Ad gurus, the manipulators of the flood gates of Kaama, are the ones we quote even on moral issues.  Is not consumerism synonymous to us with progress ?
Does , so called, goodness have any other option but to withdrw into a shell for its own survival?

Kindly do not invite disappointment by trying to seek out men of moral superiority, instead, direct your search to God's endless bounty of joy and wisdom.  That may well turn you into a magnet of moral beings.

Cheers.
Sceptic



  poetBittersweet posted 3 mnths ago

Thanks, jaijui!



  poetBittersweet posted 3 mnths ago

Trying, cheti!

Thanks!!!!!





Leave a comment

Use rich text editor:


Chennai, Male
Member Since Aug 15 2007
© 1998-2008 Copyright Sulekha.com Connecting Indians Worldwide, All Rights Reserved.